Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Was it Justified.
The United States dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan on August 1945. They claimed that it was to end World War II without risking the death of hundreds of thousands American lives during a planned invasion of the Japanese mainland.This essay on Reasons why Bombing Japan was not justified was written and submitted by your fellow student. More This paper has been submitted by user Aryana P. who studied at the University at Albany, State University of New York, USA, with average GPA 3.63 out of 4.0.S. wanted to see which was more powerful and did so by taking dvantage of the situation.The bombing of Nagasaki did not play an important role in the end of the war as the first bomb and therefore was unnecessary. Only the first bomb, dropped on Hiroshima, was justified to be dropped by the U.
Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki In August of 1945, both of the only two nuclear bombs ever used in warfare were dropped on the Japanese cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. These two bombs shaped much of the world today. In 1941.On 6 August 1945, the first atomic bomb to be dropped on foreign soil was released from Enola Gay on Hiroshima, Japan. This nuclear bomb, named Little Boy was dropped as a devastating attack in an attempt to make Japan surrender, and destroyed Hiroshima as over 70,000 people were instantly killed.
The bombing of Hiroshima The USA made a substantial contribution to ending WW2 by dropping the A-bomb on Hiroshima. The debate over whether such an aggressive action can ever be justified, even in.
